For the related vote, see Thread:674371.
- A vast majority of users want to keep the normal usage of the infobox Rare tag parameter and not use it for items that have "Rare" only in their name, so there is nothing to change there.
- About half of the respondents want to use Category:Rares for items that have "Rare" only in their name, so a vote might be created on it.
Idea | Supporters | Tally |
---|---|---|
Rare tag = Yes |
| 14 / 48 (29%) |
Rare tag = No |
| 39 / 48 (81%) |
ADD Category:Rares |
| 23 / 47 (49%) |
NO Category:Rares |
| 25 / 47 (53%) |
We have some articles about items (mostly new/upcoming promo gifts) that have "Rare" in their name but they do not have the golden rare tag on their item icon as far as we know. Some of these articles have their infobox listed as "Rare tag = Yes" and others do not. Some of these articles are in the Category:Rares while some of them are not. Example: Rare Giant Panda Plushie.
How should we handle items that are named "Rare" but that do not have the golden rare tag?
1. What should we put in the infobox?
- A - Rare tag = Yes
- B - Rare tag = No
- Other - explain in your reply
2. Should we add the Category:Rares?
- A - Yes
- B - No
- Other - explain in your reply